Leaders.com
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
  • Master Classes
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Executives
    • Marketing and Sales
    • Social Media
    • Innovation
    • Women in Business
  • Leadership
    • Personal Growth
    • Company Culture
    • Public Speaking
    • Productivity
    • Hiring
    • Social Issues
    • Leaders
  • Wealth
    • Investing
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Retirement
    • Venture Capital
    • Loans and Borrowing
    • Taxes
    • Markets
    • Real Estate
  • Master Classes
Social Media Taibbi

Matt Taibbi and other journalists continue to break The Twitter Files (Photo by Daniel Zuchnik/WireImage)

By Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff

Tyler Hummel

Tyler Hummel

Tyler Hummel is a news writer for Leaders Media. He was the Fall 2021 College Fix Fellow and Health Care...

Full bio


Learn about our editorial policy

Dec 14, 2022

More Twitter Files Revealed

The revelations of “The Twitter Files” continue, with new batches of information released since we last reported. 

Key Details

  • Twitter CEO Elon Musk has been working with independent journalists to reveal documents about internal operations and policies, thus far revealing that Twitter gave politicians tools to request tweets to be taken down, blocked the Hunter Biden laptop story against company policy, and that the company was blocking tweets from conservative accounts like Charlie Kirk, Dan Bongino, and Libsoftiktok. 
  • The first round of The Twitter Files was released by independent journalist Matt Taibbi on December 2, followed by a second round by independent journalist Bari Weiss on December 8. 
  • Taibbi then released the third round on December 9, then Author Michael Shellenberger released part four on December 10, and Weiss released round five on December 12. 
  • The newest rounds show Twitter was actively working with federal authorities on its decision-making.
  • It also reveals how the company internally defended banning the sitting President of the United States and how the decision was used on other politicians, accounts, and hashtags.

Why it’s News 

The Twitter Files have presented evidence that both Republicans and Democrats interacted in ways not in line with Twitter’s professed commitment to freedom of speech. Both parties were permitted to request tweets be taken down that were harmful to their campaigns. The preponderance of the evidence suggests that the political biases of Twitter’s staff weaponized the platform against conservative accounts. 

“It’s important to understand that Twitter’s staff & senior execs were overwhelmingly progressive. In 2018, 2020, and 2022, 96%, 98%, and 99% of Twitter staff’s political donations went to Democrats,” says journalist Shellenberger. 

The internal records of Slack logs and messages show that not only were employees seeking ways to ban prominent political opponents but that they bent the rules and celebrated when they succeeded. 

Breaking it Down 

The majority of the messages appear between January 6 and January 8, 2021, but Taibbi provides documentation that Trust and Safety lead Yoel Roth, Trust and Safety chief Vijaya Gadde, and Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker were meeting with government officials prior to the 2020 election and discussing ways to intensify and suppress political opinions that the website found undesirable, with less scrutiny toward Twitter policies. 

Policy Director Nick Pickles is shown trying to spin Twitter’s relationship with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security as “partnerships” with “experts.” The FBI sent tweets regarding election integrity and voter fraud to Twitter, which would mark them with a “Learn How Voting Is Safe and Secure” label. 

The suppression of “high-profile” accounts only intensified following the Capital Riot on January 6, 2021. 

On January 7, 2021, the website was busy trying to spin a justification to ban President Donald Trump, seeking “a change of policy for Trump alone, distinct from other political leaders” with “no concern for the free speech or democracy implications of a ban,” says Shellenberger. Twitter would ban the President on January 8 for “risk of further incitement of violence” based on “how [Trump’s tweets] are being received & interpreted.”

“For years, Twitter had resisted calls both internal and external to ban Trump on the grounds that blocking a world leader from the platform or removing their controversial tweets would hide important information that people should be able to see and debate,” says Weiss. 

Twitter employees regarded breaking its own policies to ban the President as a “one off.” 

The ban was pressured by a Washington Post story where 300 Twitter employees signed a petition demanding President Trump to be banned. Internally, Twitter struggled to find a way to explain how to defend banning Trump based on his tweets immediately following the riot. “Safety has assessed the Tweet above and determined that there is no violation of our policies at this time,” said one official. 

Twitter generally gives permission for pernicious statements from heads of state, such as when Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called Israel a “malignant cancerous tumor,” even refusing to ban accounts that directly call for violence such as a Malaysian Prime Minister’s called for Muslims to kill French citizens. 

Twitter’s excuse for banning Trump was on the ground that his words were “coded” incitement and that the team came to “view him as the leader of a terrorist group responsible for violence/deaths comparable to Christchurch shooter or Hitler and on that basis and on the totality of his Tweets, he should be de-platformed.”

Twitter employees celebrated on the Slack channel with messages like “OMG,” “!!!!!!,” and “AAAAH!” The employees quickly attempted to weaponize this tactic against “medical misinformation” next.

Home / News / More Twitter Files Revealed
Share
FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Related Stories

Wall Street Makes $100 Billion Bet on Weight Loss Pills

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff
Investing

Oct 25, 2023

Ozempic

Investor optimism around a potential blockbuster obesity drug by Structure Therapeutics led to soaring share prices across the weight-loss pharma sector.

Key Details

  • Structure Therapeutics' stock jumped 35% after reporting positive results from early clinical trials of a once-daily weight-loss pill.
  • The experimental drug helped participants lose about 5% of their body weight over one month without side effects, although there are concerns with Ozempic.
  • Analysts predict the global anti-obesity medication market could reach sales of $100 billion by 2030, up from $71 billion currently.
  • With promising growth prospects, investors are betting on companies developing new weight loss drugs like Structure, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Seattle Takes The Crown For Advanced Tech Talent

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff
Tech

Oct 24, 2023

Seattle tech talent

Seattle has emerged as the metro area with the most advanced tech talent, beating out tech hubs like San Francisco and Silicon Valley.

Key Details

  • According to a new ranking by the Burning Glass Institute, Seattle has the highest proportion of advanced tech workers compared to other cities with similarly sized tech workforces.
  • The ranking evaluated 60 million high-paying, in-demand tech job postings and histories to identify cities with cutting-edge roles like AI and cybersecurity rather than legacy tech positions.
  • With tech giants Amazon and Microsoft headquartered in Seattle, the city edged out the San Francisco Bay Area, Boston, Austin, and Raleigh on the list.
  • The report found that demand for software developers and IT support specialists has declined over the past five years as companies seek more specialized tech talent.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

More Americans Can’t Keep Up With Car Payments

by Colin Baker Leaders Staff
Loans and Borrowing

Oct 23, 2023

car loans, used cars

A record number of Americans are behind on their car loan payments as higher interest rates and prices weigh on consumers.

Key Details

  • According to data from Fitch Ratings, 6.11% of car loans were at least 60 days delinquent in September, the highest since tracking began in the early 2000s.
  • Some interest rates on used cars can rise to as much as 21%, according to Bankrate.
  • Soaring prices and rising interest rates are squeezing consumers, making it difficult for some to keep up with their auto loans.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn
Chevron Gas Deal
Markets

Oct 23, 2023

Chevron Makes $53 Billion Deal Amid Surging Gas Prices

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff
nike logo
Company Culture

Oct 20, 2023

Nike to Require More In-Office Days From Employees

by Colin Baker Leaders Staff
blue collar workers
Retirement

Oct 20, 2023

Explaining The ‘C+ Grade’ Retirement Ecosystem in The United States

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff

Recent Articles

Hiring

Nov 1, 2023

Learn the Winning Answers to the Most Common Phone Interview Questions

Come to your next phone interview fully prepared

Personal Growth

Oct 30, 2023

85 Quotes on Self-Love to Boost Your Self-Esteem

Don’t fall into the trap of harsh self-criticism

Company Culture

Oct 27, 2023

What is a Sabbatical? Your Ticket to Restful Growth and Meaning

Sabbaticals can benefits both employees and businesses

  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
Join the Leaders Community

Get exclusive tools and resources you need to grow as a leader and scale a purpose-driven business.

Subscribing indicates your consent to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Leaders.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Disclosures
  • Editorial Policy
  • Member Login

© 2025 Leaders.com - All rights reserved.

Search Leaders.com