Leaders.com
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
  • Master Classes
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Executives
    • Marketing and Sales
    • Social Media
    • Innovation
    • Women in Business
  • Leadership
    • Personal Growth
    • Company Culture
    • Public Speaking
    • Productivity
    • Hiring
    • Social Issues
    • Leaders
  • Wealth
    • Investing
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Retirement
    • Venture Capital
    • Loans and Borrowing
    • Taxes
    • Markets
    • Real Estate
  • Master Classes
Public Policy Roberts

Justice Roberts leads the dissent against student loans (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

By Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff

Tyler Hummel

Tyler Hummel

Tyler Hummel is a news writer for Leaders Media. He was the Fall 2021 College Fix Fellow and Health Care...

Full bio


Learn about our editorial policy

Mar 1, 2023

Supreme Court Weighs In On Student Loans

The U.S. Supreme Court hosted hearings on Tuesday to determine the fate of the Biden administration’s student-loan-forgiveness program. 

Key Details

  • The Supreme Court began oral hearings on Tuesday, February 28, in a nearly four-hour session that questioned the merit of using a 2003 statute, the HEROES Act, permitting the Department of Education to student-loan cut debt during a crisis.  
  • Chief Justice John Roberts questioned the half-trillion-dollar price tag and the executive order’s legality without congressional approval. The liberal wing of the court was more open to arguments in its favor. 
  • The cases include Biden vs. Nebraska and Department Of Education v. Brown. A decision is expected within the next three months, with experts suggesting it will rule against the Biden administration six to three, Forbes reports. 

Why It’s Important 

On August 24, 2022, President Joe Biden announced a student loan relief program that could reduce students’ outstanding debt by up to $20,000 for individuals earning less than $125,000 annually. 

On December 1, the Supreme Court agreed to hear oral arguments regarding the executive order’s legality following a Texas judge striking down the order and multiple lawsuits. 

President Biden’s executive order has faced persistent legal challenges since he signed it seven months ago. Even after scaling back the scope of the order in September, Republican lawmakers continue to criticize the executive branch’s authority to sign an order sweeping enough to cancel trillions of dollars in debt, even in an emergency. 

U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman ruled it lacks legislative approval and abuses executive power, striking the order down in November. 

The liberal wing of the court was more open to the order’s legal defense, with Justice Elena Kagan arguing that the HEROES Act is broadly worded enough that the Biden administration’s interpretation isn’t outside of the scope of the legislation, given the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the country’s two-year national emergency. Justice Amy Coney Barrett similarly questioned the states’ legal standing to sue the federal government’s order.  

A ruling against student loans would be a significant swipe against the executive powers of the Biden administration. It could shift more power to the Supreme Court away from the executive and legislative branches.  

Notable Quotes 

“Along comes the government and tells that person: You don’t have to pay your loan. Nobody’s telling the person who is trying to set up the lawn-service business that he doesn’t have to pay his loan. He still does, even though his tax dollars are going to support the forgiveness of the loan for the college graduate, who’s now going to make a lot more than him over the course of his lifetime,” says Justice Roberts 

“Loan forgiveness is a paradigmatic form of debt relief, and the secretary acted within the heartland of his authority and in line with the central purpose of the HEROES Act in providing that relief here. To apply the major questions doctrine to override that clear text would deny borrowers critical relief that Congress authorized and the secretary deemed essential,” says U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar.

Home / News / Supreme Court Weighs In On Student Loans
Share
FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Related Stories

61% Of Americans Are Living Paycheck-To-Paycheck 

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Markets

Sep 8, 2023

Nearly two-thirds of Americans are feeling pinched by inflation. 

Key Details

  • LendingClub’s newest research shows that 61% of adults lived paycheck-to-paycheck in July 2023, increasing from 59% in July 2022. 
  • Even with inflation decreasing from 8.5% to 3.2% in 12 months, consumers still struggle to get by.  
  • A portion of this is attributed to irresponsible spending, with 21% of survey respondents saying nonessential spending is responsible for their financial issues. 
  • Low-income consumers—making less than $50,000 per year—were among the hardest hit by tightening wallets, Fortune reports. 
  • Bankrate’s Annual Emergency Fund Report earlier this year found that 57% of Americans cannot afford a $1,000 emergency. 

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Google Cracks Down On A.I. Election Ads

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Tech

Sep 7, 2023

Political campaigns using artificial intelligence (AI) generated content must disclose this information in Google and YouTube content. 

Key Details

  • Google has revealed a new disclosure policy that will force election advertisers to label AI content distinctly from real content. 
  • As of mid-November, generative AI content must receive a label to make it clearly identifiable to avoid spreading election misinformation. 
  • Google’s digital ad business joins companies like Meta Platform’s Facebook and Instagram in cracking down on deep fakes and spreading misinformation. 

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Vivek Ramaswamy’s Anti-ESG Firm Is Worth $1 Billion 

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Environment

Sep 7, 2023

The third most popular GOP presidential candidate has built his name fighting “wokeness”—and that reputation is paying off for his asset management company. 

Key Details

  • Ohio-based Strive Asset Management is an anti-activism fund company that promises investors higher-quality returns and investments.  
  • It was partly founded by Peter Thiel and Bill Ackman to rival investors at environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-friendly firms. 
  • On Tuesday, the firm announced that its accumulated assets now exceed $1 billion, slightly more than a year after it launched in 2022. 
  • The company is also currently facing lawsuits from two former employees arguing that it mistreats staff and engages in securities violations.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn
Investing

Sep 7, 2023

Bill Gates Makes a $96.6 Million Bud Light Bet

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Cryptocurrency

Sep 6, 2023

Cathie Wood Bets Bullish On Big Tech 

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Some U.S. companies are finding it easier to hire help, after a rough few years
Hiring

Sep 6, 2023

Promotions Can Increase the Number Of Employees Quitting 

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff

Recent Articles

Business

Sep 18, 2023

25 Recession-Proof Jobs That Keep People From Getting Laid Off at Work

Learn what the safest jobs are during an economic downturn

Leadership

Sep 14, 2023

Maladaptive Daydreaming Signs + 4 Ways to Manage Them

Maladaptive daydreaming involves daydreams that interfere with daily functioning

Hiring

Sep 13, 2023

40 Smart Questions to Ask at the End of an Interview to Get Hired

Impress hiring managers with these thoughtful questions

  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
Join the Leaders Community

Get exclusive tools and resources you need to grow as a leader and scale a purpose-driven business.

Subscribing indicates your consent to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Leaders.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Disclosures
  • Editorial Policy
  • Member Login

© 2023 Leaders.com - All rights reserved.

Search Leaders.com