Leaders.com
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
  • Master Classes
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Executives
    • Marketing and Sales
    • Social Media
    • Innovation
    • Women in Business
  • Leadership
    • Personal Growth
    • Company Culture
    • Public Speaking
    • Productivity
    • Hiring
    • Social Issues
    • Leaders
  • Wealth
    • Investing
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Retirement
    • Venture Capital
    • Loans and Borrowing
    • Taxes
    • Markets
    • Real Estate
  • Master Classes
Public Policy

The Supreme Court sides with social media (Celal Gunes/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

By Hannah Bryan Leaders Staff

Hannah Bryan

News Writer

Hannah Bryan is a news writer for Leaders Media. Most recently she was a reporter for the Sanilac County News...

Full bio


Learn about our editorial policy

May 19, 2023

Supreme Court Sides With Google, Twitter

The Supreme Court ruled with Google and Twitter on Thursday in two liability cases that determined the media companies were not responsible for two terror attacks that resulted in multiple deaths. 

Key Details

  • The families of terrorism victims alleged that Google and Twitter had played a role in the attacks on their loved ones. 
  • “Plaintiffs’ allegations are insufficient to establish that these defendants aided and abetted ISIS in carrying out the relevant attack,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the unanimously decided Twitter case. 
  • The court’s reasoning was similar in the case against Google. 
  • Section 230, a law that protects social media platforms from lawsuits related to content posted by their users, was not directly addressed despite requests to limit the law’s reach, The Washington Post reports. 
  • This law has come under fire in recent years as users on one side have increasingly demanded that social-media companies regulate offensive speech, and others have insisted on absolute free speech.

Why it’s news

Tech companies view the Court ruling as a victory, as they say that a change to Section 230 would result in an onslaught of lawsuits that would prevent any future innovation and crush many popular social-media sites. Big Tech companies, along with smaller ones, have been lobbying against a change to Section 230, The Washington Post reports. 

In the case against Google, family members of an exchange student killed in a terror attack in Paris claimed that Google’s YouTube was responsible for promoting terror content that radicalized the attackers. The case against Twitter was similar, as American family members of Nawras Alassaf claimed that Twitter did not sufficiently monitor its platforms for Islamic State-related accounts. In January 2017, Alassaf and 38 others were killed in a terror attack on Reina nightclub in Turkey. 

In the filing against Google, the Court was specifically determining whether or not the algorithm was protected under Section 230. While Section 230 explicitly protects tech companies from the content their users post—such as comments or social-media posts—the media company tunes the algorithm.

Tech companies argued that any new interpretation of Section 230 would affect nearly every interaction users have online.

“Countless companies, scholars, content creators, and civil society organizations who joined with us in this case will be reassured by this result,” Google general counsel Halimah DeLaine Prado says in a statement. “We’ll continue our work to safeguard free expression online, combat harmful content, and support businesses and creators who benefit from the internet.”

Politicians on both sides have spoken against Section 230, especially as lawmakers grow more concerned about the influence of social media and the power that tech companies wield over users, The Washington Post reports.

Democrats are mainly concerned with social media’s propensity to spread false information. They ask that tech companies are held more accountable for promoting content that contains incorrect facts. Republicans’ complaint about Section 230 lies with the protections it offers to companies who remove content and suspend accounts. Users have few options to respond if they feel their content or accounts were removed in error. 

In both cases, the plaintiffs based their lawsuits on the Anti-Terrorism Act. This legislation imposes liability if one is found to be responsible for assisting in a terrorist attack. The court had to determine whether or not Google and Twitter had substantially assisted the terrorist group. 

In the Twitter case, Thomas wrote that there was insufficient evidence to provide a strong link between the media companies’ action—or inaction—and the terrorist group. 

“As alleged by plaintiffs, defendants designed virtual platforms and knowingly failed to do ‘enough’ to remove ISIS-affiliated users and ISIS-related content—out of hundreds of millions of users worldwide and an immense ocean of content—from their platforms,” he writes. “Yet, plaintiffs have failed to allege that defendants intentionally provided any substantial aid to the Reina attack or otherwise consciously participated in the Reina attack—much less that defendants so pervasively and systemically assisted ISIS as to render them liable for every ISIS attack.”

While both cases were related to Section 230, the Google case specifically addressed the law. The justices responded with an unsigned decision that says they “decline to address the application of Section 230 to a complaint that appears to state little, if any, plausible claim for relief.”

Home / News / Supreme Court Sides With Google, Twitter
Share
FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Related Stories

Wall Street Makes $100 Billion Bet on Weight Loss Pills

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff
Investing

Oct 25, 2023

Ozempic

Investor optimism around a potential blockbuster obesity drug by Structure Therapeutics led to soaring share prices across the weight-loss pharma sector.

Key Details

  • Structure Therapeutics' stock jumped 35% after reporting positive results from early clinical trials of a once-daily weight-loss pill.
  • The experimental drug helped participants lose about 5% of their body weight over one month without side effects, although there are concerns with Ozempic.
  • Analysts predict the global anti-obesity medication market could reach sales of $100 billion by 2030, up from $71 billion currently.
  • With promising growth prospects, investors are betting on companies developing new weight loss drugs like Structure, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Seattle Takes The Crown For Advanced Tech Talent

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff
Tech

Oct 24, 2023

Seattle tech talent

Seattle has emerged as the metro area with the most advanced tech talent, beating out tech hubs like San Francisco and Silicon Valley.

Key Details

  • According to a new ranking by the Burning Glass Institute, Seattle has the highest proportion of advanced tech workers compared to other cities with similarly sized tech workforces.
  • The ranking evaluated 60 million high-paying, in-demand tech job postings and histories to identify cities with cutting-edge roles like AI and cybersecurity rather than legacy tech positions.
  • With tech giants Amazon and Microsoft headquartered in Seattle, the city edged out the San Francisco Bay Area, Boston, Austin, and Raleigh on the list.
  • The report found that demand for software developers and IT support specialists has declined over the past five years as companies seek more specialized tech talent.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

More Americans Can’t Keep Up With Car Payments

by Colin Baker Leaders Staff
Loans and Borrowing

Oct 23, 2023

car loans, used cars

A record number of Americans are behind on their car loan payments as higher interest rates and prices weigh on consumers.

Key Details

  • According to data from Fitch Ratings, 6.11% of car loans were at least 60 days delinquent in September, the highest since tracking began in the early 2000s.
  • Some interest rates on used cars can rise to as much as 21%, according to Bankrate.
  • Soaring prices and rising interest rates are squeezing consumers, making it difficult for some to keep up with their auto loans.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn
Chevron Gas Deal
Markets

Oct 23, 2023

Chevron Makes $53 Billion Deal Amid Surging Gas Prices

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff
nike logo
Company Culture

Oct 20, 2023

Nike to Require More In-Office Days From Employees

by Colin Baker Leaders Staff
blue collar workers
Retirement

Oct 20, 2023

Explaining The ‘C+ Grade’ Retirement Ecosystem in The United States

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff

Recent Articles

Hiring

Nov 1, 2023

Learn the Winning Answers to the Most Common Phone Interview Questions

Come to your next phone interview fully prepared

Personal Growth

Oct 30, 2023

85 Quotes on Self-Love to Boost Your Self-Esteem

Don’t fall into the trap of harsh self-criticism

Company Culture

Oct 27, 2023

What is a Sabbatical? Your Ticket to Restful Growth and Meaning

Sabbaticals can benefits both employees and businesses

  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
Join the Leaders Community

Get exclusive tools and resources you need to grow as a leader and scale a purpose-driven business.

Subscribing indicates your consent to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Leaders.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Disclosures
  • Editorial Policy
  • Member Login

© 2025 Leaders.com - All rights reserved.

Search Leaders.com