Leaders.com
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
  • Master Classes
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Executives
    • Marketing and Sales
    • Social Media
    • Innovation
    • Women in Business
  • Leadership
    • Personal Growth
    • Company Culture
    • Public Speaking
    • Productivity
    • Hiring
    • Social Issues
    • Leaders
  • Wealth
    • Investing
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Retirement
    • Venture Capital
    • Loans and Borrowing
    • Taxes
    • Markets
    • Real Estate
  • Master Classes
Public Policy Court

Supreme Court Justices are struggling with tech implications (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

By Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff

Tyler Hummel

Tyler Hummel

Tyler Hummel is a news writer for Leaders Media. He was the Fall 2021 College Fix Fellow and Health Care...

Full bio


Learn about our editorial policy

Feb 21, 2023

Big Tech Confuses the Justices 

The Supreme Court has begun its oral arguments on Section 230 protections, creating confusion in the court as the justices struggled with the implications of the technology. 

Key Details

  • The Supreme Court heard arguments today in Gonzalez v. Google regarding a challenge to Section 230 protections, which Google is defending to avoid facing unnecessary liability for comments made on their social media platform. 
  • Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 gives social-media networks limited liability for the content spread on social media. However, a family is suing for the right to seek damages after YouTube videos allegedly spurred a 2015 ISIS attack. 
  • This morning’s opening oral arguments were met by general confusion from several of the nine supreme court justices, who repeatedly had to ask for clarification on internet-related topics, Bloomberg reports.  
  • Almost everyone on the court openly expressed confusion, with Justice Samual Alito reportedly saying, “I’m completely confused” at the prosecution’s argument, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson similarly agreeing, “I’m thoroughly confused.” 
  • Justice Elena Kagan went as far as to joke that the nine justices were “not the nine greatest experts on the internet,” receiving a laugh from the crowd. 

Why It’s Important 

The upcoming ruling on Gonzalez v. Google could change the internet forever—putting more pressure on social media networks to censor material more heavily, lest it unintentionally makes the companies liable. 

The justices debated the wording of Section 230 during the oral arguments, discussing the limitations of the law. While there is no indication of how the court will rule yet, Justice Clarence Thomas did go as far as to speculate that Google’s algorithms acting neutrally is not an argument against the social-media network—meaning YouTube hasn’t violated the Anti-Terrorism Act. 

The Supreme Court may simply default to Google’s side, given the unusual attempt to use anti-terrorism arguments as a broad precedent about the limitations of Section 230 protections, given the implications it could have for other kinds of content and free speech protections. 

Backing Up A Bit 

Justice Thomas’s comments could suggest that Google has the advantage in this particular case. He is a notable critic of Section 230, yet seemed to default against some of the arguments against it, arguing that holding YouTube accountable for its algorithms was questionable. “I don’t understand how a neutral suggestion about something that you’ve expressed an interest in is aiding and abetting,” NBC News speculates. 

Justice Kagan similarly responded to a comment about Section 230 after the plaintiffs’ lawyer Eric Schnapper argued that the law doesn’t protect YouTube thumbnails or recommended videos. “Algorithms are endemic to the internet. Does your position send us down the road such as 230 really can’t mean anything at all?” she asks. 

Home / News / Big Tech Confuses the Justices 
Share
FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Related Stories

Wall Street Makes $100 Billion Bet on Weight Loss Pills

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff
Investing

Oct 25, 2023

Ozempic

Investor optimism around a potential blockbuster obesity drug by Structure Therapeutics led to soaring share prices across the weight-loss pharma sector.

Key Details

  • Structure Therapeutics' stock jumped 35% after reporting positive results from early clinical trials of a once-daily weight-loss pill.
  • The experimental drug helped participants lose about 5% of their body weight over one month without side effects, although there are concerns with Ozempic.
  • Analysts predict the global anti-obesity medication market could reach sales of $100 billion by 2030, up from $71 billion currently.
  • With promising growth prospects, investors are betting on companies developing new weight loss drugs like Structure, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Seattle Takes The Crown For Advanced Tech Talent

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff
Tech

Oct 24, 2023

Seattle tech talent

Seattle has emerged as the metro area with the most advanced tech talent, beating out tech hubs like San Francisco and Silicon Valley.

Key Details

  • According to a new ranking by the Burning Glass Institute, Seattle has the highest proportion of advanced tech workers compared to other cities with similarly sized tech workforces.
  • The ranking evaluated 60 million high-paying, in-demand tech job postings and histories to identify cities with cutting-edge roles like AI and cybersecurity rather than legacy tech positions.
  • With tech giants Amazon and Microsoft headquartered in Seattle, the city edged out the San Francisco Bay Area, Boston, Austin, and Raleigh on the list.
  • The report found that demand for software developers and IT support specialists has declined over the past five years as companies seek more specialized tech talent.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

More Americans Can’t Keep Up With Car Payments

by Colin Baker Leaders Staff
Loans and Borrowing

Oct 23, 2023

car loans, used cars

A record number of Americans are behind on their car loan payments as higher interest rates and prices weigh on consumers.

Key Details

  • According to data from Fitch Ratings, 6.11% of car loans were at least 60 days delinquent in September, the highest since tracking began in the early 2000s.
  • Some interest rates on used cars can rise to as much as 21%, according to Bankrate.
  • Soaring prices and rising interest rates are squeezing consumers, making it difficult for some to keep up with their auto loans.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn
Chevron Gas Deal
Markets

Oct 23, 2023

Chevron Makes $53 Billion Deal Amid Surging Gas Prices

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff
nike logo
Company Culture

Oct 20, 2023

Nike to Require More In-Office Days From Employees

by Colin Baker Leaders Staff
blue collar workers
Retirement

Oct 20, 2023

Explaining The ‘C+ Grade’ Retirement Ecosystem in The United States

by PJ Howland Leaders Staff

Recent Articles

Hiring

Nov 1, 2023

Learn the Winning Answers to the Most Common Phone Interview Questions

Come to your next phone interview fully prepared

Personal Growth

Oct 30, 2023

85 Quotes on Self-Love to Boost Your Self-Esteem

Don’t fall into the trap of harsh self-criticism

Company Culture

Oct 27, 2023

What is a Sabbatical? Your Ticket to Restful Growth and Meaning

Sabbaticals can benefits both employees and businesses

  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
Join the Leaders Community

Get exclusive tools and resources you need to grow as a leader and scale a purpose-driven business.

Subscribing indicates your consent to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Leaders.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Disclosures
  • Editorial Policy
  • Member Login

© 2025 Leaders.com - All rights reserved.

Search Leaders.com