Leaders.com
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
  • Master Classes
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Executives
    • Marketing and Sales
    • Social Media
    • Innovation
    • Women in Business
  • Leadership
    • Personal Growth
    • Company Culture
    • Public Speaking
    • Productivity
    • Hiring
    • Social Issues
    • Leaders
  • Wealth
    • Investing
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Retirement
    • Venture Capital
    • Loans and Borrowing
    • Taxes
    • Markets
    • Real Estate
  • Master Classes
  • Login
  • Subscribe
Markets

Morgan Stanley is one of the banks supporting Musk's purchase of Twitter (Photo by Stephen Chernin/Getty Images)

By Savannah Young Leaders Staff

Savannah Young

Savannah Young

News Writer

Savannah Young is a news writer for Leaders Media. Previously, she was a digital reporter for WATE Channel 6 (ABC)...

Full bio


Learn about our editorial policy

Oct 5, 2022

Banks No Longer Happy With Twitter Deal

If Elon Musk follows through with his Twitter deal, the banks supporting him are in a worse position than when the deal was originally made.

Key Details

  • Elon Musk has officially reverted back to his original offer to buy Twitter for $54.20 a share—for a total of $44 billion.
  • Banks have recently been struggling to offload billions of dollars in buyout debt they committed to in better times and Musk’s turn of events has just added fuel to the fire.
  • Now, bankers may struggle to sell the risky Twitter buyout debt just as credit markets begin to crack. With yields at multi year highs, they’re potentially on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars of losses on the unsecured portion alone should they try to unload it to investors, according to Bloomberg writers Olivia Raimonde and Paula Seligson.

Why it’s news

Elon Musk first offered to buy Twitter in April for $54.20 a share or $44 billion. Since the initial offer there have been many twists and turns eventually leading to Musk attempting to abandon the deal.

After a long battle Musk now has agreed to go back to his original deal, but the economy has changed dramatically since the original deal was agreed upon and now banks will have to fight for the funding or lose a lot of money.

While Musk will provide much of $44 billion by selling down his stake in electric vehicle maker Tesla and by leaning on equity financing from large investors, major banks have committed to provide $12.5 billion. They include Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, and Barclays.

The banks committed debt financing for the deal back in April, with the intention to sell most of that to institutional investors. 

As the economy continues to head down a bad path, investors are being very cautious about where they put their money making it not look good for bankers.

“Given the incremental company specific news flow since the deal was agreed to—combined with the meaningful deterioration in the economy—lenders will be very hesitant to provide financing.” says portfolio manager at Brandywine Global Investment Management, John McClain.

The banks were already facing big losses considering they promised a maximum interest rate of about 11.75% on the unsecured bond portion but CCC debt now trades on average at around 15%, according to Bloomberg data.

The deal has not yet been sealed, but it most likely will soon leave banks a small amount of time to get money.

Backing up a Bit

The timeline between Elon Musk and Twitter is a lengthy one.

In April, Elon Musk announced that he held a 9.2% stake in Twitter, which made him the social-media company’s largest shareholder. Twitter’s stock price soared 25% after the announcement.

Later that month, the billionaire entrepreneur offered to buy all of Twitter at $54.20 per share—equaling about $44 billion. He said he originally invested in the platform because he believes it is failing in its potential to be the leading platform for free speech around the globe. In fact, he asked his 2 million followers if Twitter adhered to principles of free speech, and 70% said “no.” 

Last month, Musk decided to back out of the deal, claiming there were too many fake accounts on the platform. Twitter has since sued Musk in Delaware Court of Chancery to complete the deal and requested the trial to take place in September. Musk, on the other hand, wanted to delay the trial until February 2023, stating that a case of this size takes time to prepare. Twitter was granted its wish of an expedited trial, with Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick, the presiding judge, setting a five-day trial for October. Musk then countersued Twitter, stating his reason for the termination was due to Twitter not being upfront about the number of fake accounts on the platform.

Then, Elon Musk and his legal team subpoenaed Twitter’s founder and former CEO Jack Dorsey, to get him to release documents that provide accurate information on bots and spam accounts on the social-media platform and now these documents have come out from Zatko and Musk and his lawyers have subpoenaed him as well. Then, Musk’s text messages were revealed in court filings and it showed that Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey tried to facilitate Musk’s Twitter takeover, which led to Musk officially reverting back to his original deal to buy the social media company.

Home / News / Banks No Longer Happy With Twitter Deal
Share
FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Related Stories

Tech Leaders Warn Of A.I. Dangers

by Savannah Young Leaders Staff
Leadership

17 minutes ago

2020 presidential election candidate Andrew Yang is among 1,000 top tech leaders signing a letter urging companies to pause AI development

More than 1,000 technology leaders and researchers have signed an open letter urging companies to pause artificial intelligence (AI) development stating that the systems are  “profound risks to society and humanity.”

Key Details

  • More than 1,000 tech leaders, including Elon Musk, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak, 2020 presidential election candidate Andrew Yang, Atomic Scientists president Rachel Bronson, and others, have signed a letter urging AI systems to be paused.
  • Since the debut of AI chatbot ChatGPT in November, the tech has attracted 100 million subscribers and led other companies to deploy artificial technology to capitalize on the trend quickly.
  • Now tech leaders are warning that the systems must be paused because they are too advanced and the tools present “profound risks to society and humanity.”

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

The Shift In America’s Core Values

by Savannah Young Leaders Staff
Business

18 minutes ago

A new study shows that priorities that once defined most Americans for generations are falling behind.

Key Details

  • Around 38% of poll respondents say patriotism is very important, and 39% say religion is very important, according to a study by The Wall Street Journal and research organization NORC.
  • When the study was first conducted in 1998, 70% of respondents deemed patriotism to be very important, and 62% said so of religion.
  • Tolerance for others was very important to 80% of American respondents four years ago but has fallen to 58% in the last recording.
  • Having children, involvement in their community, and hard work are also answer choices that have significantly decreased in importance to the American public over the last few years.
  • The only aspect that has grown in importance is money which is cited as very important by 43% in the new survey, up from 31% in 1998.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

The Next Big Thing—Influencer Management

by Savannah Young Leaders Staff
Social Media

22 minutes ago

TikTok influencer Yusuf Panseri performs a video for the social network TikTok

Social media influencing has quickly become one of the most sought-after jobs, but some people have found being an influencer assistant is the best way to become profitable and have a steady income in the industry.

Key Details

  • In a 2022 survey of 1,000 18 to 25-year-olds, 27% say they planned to be an influencer, and nearly 15% said it was their only career choice, according to HigherVisibility.
  • A micro-influencer, someone with 10,000 to 50,000 followers, can earn anywhere between $40,000 and $100,000 per year, while an influencer with 1 million followers can make thousands per social media post.
  • An influencer marketing manager or assistant in the U.S. typically makes anywhere from $92,904 to $136,058, for an average of $111,473 annually, according to Salary.com.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn
shell production
Business

34 minutes ago

Shell Wavers On Oil Output Reduction

by Hannah Bryan Leaders Staff
Russia economy
Business

About an hour ago

One Year Out: War’s Effect On Russia’s Economy

by Hannah Bryan Leaders Staff
VR
Tech

About an hour ago

Disney Uninstalls the Metaverse 

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff

Recent Articles

Leadership

6 hours ago

The Most Productive People Follow Daily Routines, Here’s Why

By following a structured daily routine, you give your mind a break from making constant decisions, saving mental energy and willpower

Productivity

Mar 27, 2023

84% of Workers Are Easily Distracted—Here Are 10 Tricks to Stay Focused

Learn to improve mental performance when you can’t stay focused.

Leadership

Mar 22, 2023

Creating Loyal Employees Is About More Than Just the Paycheck

If you think simply paying your employees more will gain their loyalty, think again.

  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
Join the Leaders Community

Get exclusive tools and resources you need to grow as a leader and scale a purpose-driven business.

Subscribing indicates your consent to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Leaders.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Disclosures
  • Editorial Policy
  • Member Login

© 2023 Leaders.com - All rights reserved.

Search Leaders.com