Leaders.com
  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
  • Master Classes
  • Business
    • Entrepreneurs
    • Executives
    • Marketing and Sales
    • Social Media
    • Innovation
    • Women in Business
  • Leadership
    • Personal Growth
    • Company Culture
    • Public Speaking
    • Productivity
    • Hiring
    • Social Issues
    • Leaders
  • Wealth
    • Investing
    • Cryptocurrency
    • Retirement
    • Venture Capital
    • Loans and Borrowing
    • Taxes
    • Markets
    • Real Estate
  • Master Classes
Business Michael Regan

EPA head Michael Regan suggests nuclear power is necessary (Photo by Joshua Roberts/Getty Images)

By Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff

Tyler Hummel

Tyler Hummel

Tyler Hummel is a news writer for Leaders Media. He was the Fall 2021 College Fix Fellow and Health Care...

Full bio


Learn about our editorial policy

Sep 6, 2022

The EPA’s Move to Nuclear 

Environmentalists are continuing to turn to nuclear power as a solution for the nation’s fuel supply. 

Key details
Following talks with Japanese politician Akihiro Nishimura, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) head Michael Regan affirmed the shared belief that the United States and Japan need to embrace nuclear energy as part of their countries’ mutual efforts to fight climate change. They called the necessity “critical,” The Washington Post reports. 

“I think the science tells us that we have to respond to the climate crisis with a sense of urgency and nuclear energy and nuclear technology has and can have a role in continuing with a zero emissions contribution to the climate,” says Regan. 

“The opportunities for advanced nuclear technology will be critical if we’re going to meet our climate goals.”

Why it’s news
The press conference was a mild change in tune for both the EPA and Japanese politicians. The EPA doesn’t have a strong anti-nuclear stance but has been criticized in the past for pushing down too hard on America’s nuclear industry. It proposed a Clean Power Plan in 2014 that some nuclear experts criticized as burdensome. 

“An extensive analysis of the proposal, however, reveals that current nuclear-generating capacity would largely suffer under the new carbon rules… 15 states are actually incentivized to shut down all of their nuclear units and replace them with natural gas combined cycle generation,” says NuclearNewswire. 

Japan has a strong anti-nuclear public opinion as a result of the 2011 Fukushima meltdown, which soured the public on nuclear energy. Many older reactors in Japan were shut down after the meltdown. 

The country has joined world efforts to curb carbon emissions, but has faced criticism for not laying out a clear plan, WP reports. Nuclear will have to be a part of the nation’s green push, and the current prime minister Fumio Kishida is working to push the development of safer nuclear reactors to bolster their transition. 

“While maintaining a 20% to 22% target for nuclear energy as part of its energy mix for 2030, Japan’s government had previously insisted it was not considering building new plants or replacing aged reactors, apparently to avoid stoking criticism from a wary public. Kishida’s recent comment represents a sharp change from that stance,” says The Washington Post. 

Backing up a bit
The announcement comes as America and European countries are pushing for alternatives to fossil fuels in the immediate future. As we previously reported, nuclear power offers one of the most promising net-zero alternatives for clean energy and many Western governments are extending the lives of their aging nuclear reactors to meet demands. 

President Joe Biden set aside $30 billion in tax credits to bolster existing facilities for the next decade during the transition to renewable energy, as part of the Inflation Reduction Act. 

“While costs of wind, solar, and battery storage are coming down and will dominate the future market, existing technology will remain important for the zero-emissions goal if we want to respond to the climate crisis in a timely manner,” says The Washington Post. 

Home / News / The EPA’s Move to Nuclear 
Share
FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Related Stories

61% Of Americans Are Living Paycheck-To-Paycheck 

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Markets

Sep 8, 2023

Nearly two-thirds of Americans are feeling pinched by inflation. 

Key Details

  • LendingClub’s newest research shows that 61% of adults lived paycheck-to-paycheck in July 2023, increasing from 59% in July 2022. 
  • Even with inflation decreasing from 8.5% to 3.2% in 12 months, consumers still struggle to get by.  
  • A portion of this is attributed to irresponsible spending, with 21% of survey respondents saying nonessential spending is responsible for their financial issues. 
  • Low-income consumers—making less than $50,000 per year—were among the hardest hit by tightening wallets, Fortune reports. 
  • Bankrate’s Annual Emergency Fund Report earlier this year found that 57% of Americans cannot afford a $1,000 emergency. 

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Google Cracks Down On A.I. Election Ads

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Tech

Sep 7, 2023

Political campaigns using artificial intelligence (AI) generated content must disclose this information in Google and YouTube content. 

Key Details

  • Google has revealed a new disclosure policy that will force election advertisers to label AI content distinctly from real content. 
  • As of mid-November, generative AI content must receive a label to make it clearly identifiable to avoid spreading election misinformation. 
  • Google’s digital ad business joins companies like Meta Platform’s Facebook and Instagram in cracking down on deep fakes and spreading misinformation. 

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn

Vivek Ramaswamy’s Anti-ESG Firm Is Worth $1 Billion 

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Environment

Sep 7, 2023

The third most popular GOP presidential candidate has built his name fighting “wokeness”—and that reputation is paying off for his asset management company. 

Key Details

  • Ohio-based Strive Asset Management is an anti-activism fund company that promises investors higher-quality returns and investments.  
  • It was partly founded by Peter Thiel and Bill Ackman to rival investors at environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-friendly firms. 
  • On Tuesday, the firm announced that its accumulated assets now exceed $1 billion, slightly more than a year after it launched in 2022. 
  • The company is also currently facing lawsuits from two former employees arguing that it mistreats staff and engages in securities violations.

Go deeper

FacebookTweetEmailLinkedIn
Investing

Sep 7, 2023

Bill Gates Makes a $96.6 Million Bud Light Bet

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Cryptocurrency

Sep 6, 2023

Cathie Wood Bets Bullish On Big Tech 

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff
Some U.S. companies are finding it easier to hire help, after a rough few years
Hiring

Sep 6, 2023

Promotions Can Increase the Number Of Employees Quitting 

by Tyler Hummel Leaders Staff

Recent Articles

Leadership

Sep 14, 2023

Maladaptive Daydreaming Signs + 4 Ways to Manage Them

Maladaptive daydreaming involves daydreams that interfere with daily functioning

Hiring

Sep 13, 2023

40 Smart Questions to Ask at the End of an Interview to Get Hired

Impress hiring managers with these thoughtful questions

Business

Sep 12, 2023

S Corp vs. C Corp: 7 Factors to Consider When Choosing a Corporate Structure

Entrepreneurs face a pivotal decision when starting a business: the C corp or the S corp

  • Business
  • Leadership
  • Wealth
Join the Leaders Community

Get exclusive tools and resources you need to grow as a leader and scale a purpose-driven business.

Subscribing indicates your consent to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

Leaders.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Careers
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
  • Disclosures
  • Editorial Policy
  • Member Login

© 2023 Leaders.com - All rights reserved.

Search Leaders.com